Download RavenDB

Author: d | 2025-04-25

★★★★☆ (4.8 / 1732 reviews)

thebat 7.3.2.0.0

Version RavenDB 5.3. Current RavenDB 7.0 RavenDB 6.2 RavenDB 6.0 RavenDB 5.4 Legacy; RavenDB 5.3 RavenDB 5.2 Download Certificate Click to download the certificate and follow Download . Grab the latest version of RavenDB . RavenDB Cloud . Start your DBaaS in minutes RavenDB 5.0 RavenDB 4.2 RavenDB 4.1 RavenDB 4.0 RavenDB 3.5 RavenDB 3.0

fall guys linux

Getting started with RavenDB. RavenDB is

13-Jan-14 Entity Framework 6 is supported 3.1.281 11-Nov-13 Visual Studio 2013 is supported Auto detection of connection string is improved 3.0.275 09-Aug-13 Visual Studio 2013 Preview is supported 3.0.273 07-Aug-13 The bug with profiling of Web Site projects in Visual Studio 2010 is fixed 3.0.272 05-Aug-13 ORM Profiler: performance is improved ORM Profiler: attaching to a process is improved 3.0.269 19-Jun-13 The check for updates functionality is added3.0.264 11-Jun-13 The bug with displaying dialog windows is fixed3.0.261 07-Jun-13 ORM Profiler is added2.0.22 03-Apr-13 Support for IAsyncDocumentSession of the RavenDB query provider is added2.0.21 19-Mar-13 The bug related to the "Can't compile assembly..." exception is fixed when using the RavenDB provider The bug related to the "Transformation error:..." exception is fixed when executing a Visual Basic query2.0.20 06-Mar-13 The bug related to the "A null was returned after calling the 'get_ProviderFactory' method" exception is fixed The bug related to the "The method or operation is not implemented" exception is fixed when executing a Visual Basic query2.0.19 11-Feb-13 Support for Visual Basic queries is improved Support for List and Array parameters is improved The bug related to "The method or operation is not implemented" exception is fixed2.0.17 29-Jan-13 The support for List and array parameters is added Integration with Visual Studio debugger is added Advanced connection string editor is added The support for RavenDB provider is added SQL logging of Entity Framework queries is improved Performance is improved1.0.24 14-Dec-12 Added ability to stop execution of a query when it enters an infinite loop Added ability to execute queries defined in a method of DataContext class The bug related to 'Object reference not set to an instance of an object' exception is fixed1.0.23 10-Dec-12 The bug related to usage of enums in a query is fixed The bug related to loading of third-party assemblies during query execution is fixed1.0.22 05-Dec-12 The bug related to the 'Method not found...' exception when there are ref, out, or params parameters is fixed The bug related to usage of compiler generated class names is fixed1.0.21 29-Nov-12 Added support for Web Site projects Fixed bug related to InvalidCastException when running a query from a class constructor1.0.20 28-Nov-12 The bug with the disabled 'Run LINQ Query' command in Visual Basic projects is fixed The bug related to the 'Could not load file or assembly Mono.Cecil.Pdb...' exception is fixed1.0.19 22-Nov-12 The bug related to the "The specified named connection is. Version RavenDB 5.3. Current RavenDB 7.0 RavenDB 6.2 RavenDB 6.0 RavenDB 5.4 Legacy; RavenDB 5.3 RavenDB 5.2 Download Certificate Click to download the certificate and follow Download . Grab the latest version of RavenDB . RavenDB Cloud . Start your DBaaS in minutes RavenDB 5.0 RavenDB 4.2 RavenDB 4.1 RavenDB 4.0 RavenDB 3.5 RavenDB 3.0 Download . Grab the latest version of RavenDB . RavenDB Cloud . Start your DBaaS in minutes RavenDB 5.0 RavenDB 4.2 RavenDB 4.1 RavenDB 4.0 RavenDB 3.5 Download . Grab the latest version of RavenDB . RavenDB Cloud . Start your DBaaS in minutes Version RavenDB 5.1. Current RavenDB 7.0 RavenDB 6.2 RavenDB 6.0 RavenDB 5.4 Download . Grab the latest version of RavenDB . RavenDB Cloud . Start your DBaaS in minutes Version RavenDB 5.4. Current RavenDB 7.0 RavenDB 6.2 RavenDB 6.0 RavenDB 5.4 Download . Grab the latest version of RavenDB . RavenDB Cloud . Start your DBaaS in minutes Version RavenDB 5.3. Current RavenDB 7.0 RavenDB 6.2 RavenDB 6.0 RavenDB 5.4 Download . Grab the latest version of RavenDB . RavenDB Cloud . Start your DBaaS in minutes Version RavenDB 5.3. Current RavenDB 6.2 RavenDB 6.0 RavenDB 5.4 Legacy; RavenDB Download . Grab the latest version of RavenDB . RavenDB Cloud . Start your DBaaS in minutes Version RavenDB 5.4. Current RavenDB 6.2 RavenDB 6.0 RavenDB 5.4 Legacy; RavenDB Skip to main content This browser is no longer supported. Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support. Use NoSQL databases as a persistence infrastructure Article09/10/2024 In this article -->TipThis content is an excerpt from the eBook, .NET Microservices Architecture for Containerized .NET Applications, available on .NET Docs or as a free downloadable PDF that can be read offline.When you use NoSQL databases for your infrastructure data tier, you typically do not use an ORM like Entity Framework Core. Instead you use the API provided by the NoSQL engine, such as Azure Cosmos DB, MongoDB, Cassandra, RavenDB, CouchDB, or Azure Storage Tables.However, when you use a NoSQL database, especially a document-oriented database like Azure Cosmos DB, CouchDB, or RavenDB, the way you design your model with DDD aggregates is partially similar to how you can do it in EF Core, in regards to the identification of aggregate roots, child entity classes, and value object classes. But, ultimately, the database selection will impact in your design.When you use a document-oriented database, you implement an aggregate as a single document, serialized in JSON or another format. However, the use of the database is transparent from a domain model code point of view. When using a NoSQL database, you still are using entity classes and aggregate root classes, but with more flexibility than when using EF Core because the persistence is not relational.The difference is in how you persist that model. If you implemented your domain model based on POCO entity classes, agnostic to the infrastructure persistence, it might look like you could move to a different persistence infrastructure, even from relational to NoSQL. However, that should not be your goal. There are always constraints and trade-offs in the different database technologies, so you will not be able to have the same model for relational or NoSQL databases. Changing persistence models is not a trivial task, because transactions and persistence operations will be very different.For example, in a document-oriented database, it is okay for an aggregate root to have multiple child collection properties. In a relational database, querying multiple child collection properties is not easily optimized, because you get a UNION ALL SQL statement back from EF. Having the same domain model for relational databases or NoSQL databases is not simple, and you should not try to do it. You really have to design your

Comments

User5561

13-Jan-14 Entity Framework 6 is supported 3.1.281 11-Nov-13 Visual Studio 2013 is supported Auto detection of connection string is improved 3.0.275 09-Aug-13 Visual Studio 2013 Preview is supported 3.0.273 07-Aug-13 The bug with profiling of Web Site projects in Visual Studio 2010 is fixed 3.0.272 05-Aug-13 ORM Profiler: performance is improved ORM Profiler: attaching to a process is improved 3.0.269 19-Jun-13 The check for updates functionality is added3.0.264 11-Jun-13 The bug with displaying dialog windows is fixed3.0.261 07-Jun-13 ORM Profiler is added2.0.22 03-Apr-13 Support for IAsyncDocumentSession of the RavenDB query provider is added2.0.21 19-Mar-13 The bug related to the "Can't compile assembly..." exception is fixed when using the RavenDB provider The bug related to the "Transformation error:..." exception is fixed when executing a Visual Basic query2.0.20 06-Mar-13 The bug related to the "A null was returned after calling the 'get_ProviderFactory' method" exception is fixed The bug related to the "The method or operation is not implemented" exception is fixed when executing a Visual Basic query2.0.19 11-Feb-13 Support for Visual Basic queries is improved Support for List and Array parameters is improved The bug related to "The method or operation is not implemented" exception is fixed2.0.17 29-Jan-13 The support for List and array parameters is added Integration with Visual Studio debugger is added Advanced connection string editor is added The support for RavenDB provider is added SQL logging of Entity Framework queries is improved Performance is improved1.0.24 14-Dec-12 Added ability to stop execution of a query when it enters an infinite loop Added ability to execute queries defined in a method of DataContext class The bug related to 'Object reference not set to an instance of an object' exception is fixed1.0.23 10-Dec-12 The bug related to usage of enums in a query is fixed The bug related to loading of third-party assemblies during query execution is fixed1.0.22 05-Dec-12 The bug related to the 'Method not found...' exception when there are ref, out, or params parameters is fixed The bug related to usage of compiler generated class names is fixed1.0.21 29-Nov-12 Added support for Web Site projects Fixed bug related to InvalidCastException when running a query from a class constructor1.0.20 28-Nov-12 The bug with the disabled 'Run LINQ Query' command in Visual Basic projects is fixed The bug related to the 'Could not load file or assembly Mono.Cecil.Pdb...' exception is fixed1.0.19 22-Nov-12 The bug related to the "The specified named connection is

2025-04-06
User7126

Skip to main content This browser is no longer supported. Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support. Use NoSQL databases as a persistence infrastructure Article09/10/2024 In this article -->TipThis content is an excerpt from the eBook, .NET Microservices Architecture for Containerized .NET Applications, available on .NET Docs or as a free downloadable PDF that can be read offline.When you use NoSQL databases for your infrastructure data tier, you typically do not use an ORM like Entity Framework Core. Instead you use the API provided by the NoSQL engine, such as Azure Cosmos DB, MongoDB, Cassandra, RavenDB, CouchDB, or Azure Storage Tables.However, when you use a NoSQL database, especially a document-oriented database like Azure Cosmos DB, CouchDB, or RavenDB, the way you design your model with DDD aggregates is partially similar to how you can do it in EF Core, in regards to the identification of aggregate roots, child entity classes, and value object classes. But, ultimately, the database selection will impact in your design.When you use a document-oriented database, you implement an aggregate as a single document, serialized in JSON or another format. However, the use of the database is transparent from a domain model code point of view. When using a NoSQL database, you still are using entity classes and aggregate root classes, but with more flexibility than when using EF Core because the persistence is not relational.The difference is in how you persist that model. If you implemented your domain model based on POCO entity classes, agnostic to the infrastructure persistence, it might look like you could move to a different persistence infrastructure, even from relational to NoSQL. However, that should not be your goal. There are always constraints and trade-offs in the different database technologies, so you will not be able to have the same model for relational or NoSQL databases. Changing persistence models is not a trivial task, because transactions and persistence operations will be very different.For example, in a document-oriented database, it is okay for an aggregate root to have multiple child collection properties. In a relational database, querying multiple child collection properties is not easily optimized, because you get a UNION ALL SQL statement back from EF. Having the same domain model for relational databases or NoSQL databases is not simple, and you should not try to do it. You really have to design your

2025-04-07
User2775

Microsoft Access Reviews (0) Ask a Question No reviews yet. Rate this app or be the first to review. Write a Review Alternatives of Microsoft Access Explore alternative software options that can fulfill similar requirements as Microsoft Access. Evaluate their features, pricing, and user feedback to find the perfect fit for your needs. Microsoft Access FAQs How much does Microsoft Access cost? The starting price of Microsoft Access is $ 7/User/Month. It has different pricing plans:Basic : $ 7/User/MonthStandard : $ 14/User/MonthPremium : $ 24/User/MonthMicrosoft Access also provides a free trial to users. What are the top 5 features for Microsoft Access? The top 5 features for Microsoft Access are:Data SecurityDashboardApproval Process ControlData ManagementQuestion Library What type of customer support is available from Microsoft Access? The available support which Microsoft Access provides is:PhoneEmailLive supportTicketsTraining What types of businesses does Microsoft Access serve? Microsoft Access serves a wide range of businesses, including but not limited to Startups, SMBs, Mid-Market & Enterprises. Who are the primary competitors of Microsoft Access? The three major competitors of Microsoft Access are RavenDB, InterScale Scales Manager and PopSQL. Compare and evaluate their features, advantages, disadvantages, and other aspects to find the best option for your business.

2025-04-16

Add Comment