Download oorexx

The core team. If we include the gtk> runtime files it means> we also have to distribute the source for those file> because of the LGPL> license. Distributing mixed license software is not a> good idea as it> just leads to trouble. So we need some discussion on> this. But I am not> against distributing the ooRexx code and an installer> we develop on our> own.> > > Ah ... that's right, I had forgot about the GPL license.> > > So, I don't think the gtk runtime should be in the installer.> > > > But, what would be nice Perry, would be to include a readme> file that detailed exactly how the user of gtkrexx can install> the runtime themselves. > > > --> Mark Miesfeld> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:> > Build for Windows Store.> > _______________________________________________> Oorexx-devel mailing list> Oor...@li...> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:> > Build for Windows Store.> > _______________________________________________> Oorexx-devel mailing list> Oor...@li...> Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI? Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.

Vacation soon and will not be back until 8/1.As to packaging rexxgtk for Windows, I think we need some discussion onthis among the core team. If we include the gtk runtime files it meanswe also have to distribute the source for those file because of the LGPLlicense. Distributing mixed license software is not a good idea as itjust leads to trouble. So we need some discussion on this. But I am notagainst distributing the ooRexx code and an installer we develop on ourown.David Ashley From: Mark M. - 2013-07-06 16:58:13 On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, David Ashley wrote:>> As to packaging rexxgtk for Windows, I think we need some discussion on> this among the core team. If we include the gtk runtime files it means> we also have to distribute the source for those file because of the LGPL> license. Distributing mixed license software is not a good idea as it> just leads to trouble. So we need some discussion on this. But I am not> against distributing the ooRexx code and an installer we develop on our> own.>Ah ... that's right, I had forgot about the GPL license.So, I don't think the gtk runtime should be in the installer.But, what would be nice Perry, would be to include a readme file thatdetailed exactly how the user of gtkrexx can install the runtimethemselves.--Mark Miesfeld From: Perry W. - 2013-07-08 11:46:11 Hi,Ok. I just looked in the gtk2 installer and it put links for the projectspage in the license page. I'll do the same in my gtk3 installer. Aboutgtkrexx I think nsis installers can download and install other packages.Doing you dont have to package the gtk runtime and keeps easy for the user. Em 06/07/2013 13:58, "Mark Miesfeld" escreveu:> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, David

Ashley wrote:>>>>> As to packaging rexxgtk for Windows, I think we need some discussion on>> this among the core team. If we include the gtk runtime files it means>> we also have to distribute the source for those file because of the LGPL>> license. Distributing mixed license software is not a good idea as it>> just leads to trouble. So we need some discussion on this. But I am not>> against distributing the ooRexx code and an installer we develop on our>> own.>>>> Ah ... that's right, I had forgot about the GPL license.>> So, I don't think the gtk runtime should be in the installer.>> But, what would be nice Perry, would be to include a readme file that> detailed exactly how the user of gtkrexx can install the runtime> themselves.>> --> Mark Miesfeld>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:>> Build for Windows Store.>> _______________________________________________> Oorexx-devel mailing list> Oor...@li...> From: David A. - 2013-07-08 12:50:30 If the installer can install other external packages from a differentsource then that would be a good solution, as long as it is made clearto the user that the GTK packages are not being pulled from an ooRexxweb site.David AshleyOn Mon, 2013-07-08 at 08:46 -0300, Perry Werneck wrote:> Hi, > > Ok. I just looked in the gtk2 installer and it put links for the> projects page in the license page. I'll do the same in my gtk3> installer. About gtkrexx I think nsis installers can download and> install other packages. Doing you dont have to package the gtk runtime> and keeps easy for the user. > > > Em 06/07/2013 13:58, "Mark Miesfeld" escreveu:> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, David Ashley> wrote:> > As to packaging rexxgtk for Windows, I think we need> some discussion on> this among