Ammo sek

Author: e | 2025-04-24

View the profiles of people named Ammo Sek. Join Facebook to connect with Ammo Sek and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and

Results for ammo sek - OpticsPlanet

The store will not work correctly when cookies are disabled. Skip to items Shop By --> Shopping Options--> Gender Category Item Type Size Length Price SEK 0.00 - SEK 500.00 316 items SEK 500.00 - SEK 1,000.00 119 items SEK 1,000.00 - SEK 1,500.00 26 items SEK 1,500.00 - SEK 2,000.00 1 item SEK 2,000.00 - SEK 2,500.00 1 item SEK 3,000.00 - SEK 3,500.00 2 items SEK 3,500.00 - SEK 4,000.00 1 item Color Regular Price SEK 1,845.00 Special Price SEK 1,107.00 5.11® A/T™ HD Regular Price SEK 785.00 Special Price SEK 471.00 Donna Hoodie Regular Price SEK 655.00 Special Price SEK 393.00 Shauna Short Regular Price SEK 675.00 Special Price SEK 405.00 Eden Short More About 5.11 Outlet Welcome to the 5.11 Tactical® outlet, where you can find high-quality tactical gear at discounted prices. Our outlet collection includes a wide variety of products, such as apparel, footwear, and accessories for both men and women. Whether you are searching for training gear, outdoor equipment, range essentials, or professional attire, our outlet section has it all.Our discounted tactical gear is designed for durability, functionality, and comfort, ensuring that you are well-equipped for any mission or adventure. With a variety of sizes, colors, and styles available, you are sure to find the perfect gear to suit your needs. Don't miss out on these unbeatable deals and discounts on some of the best tactical gear on the market. Explore our 5.11 Tactical® outlet today and take advantage of exceptional value on top-quality products. ExpectedPrice ==> Price@5e8c92f4 andpriceWithVAT ==> Price@22927a81. We can definitely improve visibility here by overriding the toString method in thePrice class:public class Price { private long amount; private String currency; public Price(long amount, String currency) { this.amount = amount; this.currency = currency; } public long getAmount() { return amount; } public String getCurrency() { return currency; } public Price applyVAT() { amount = Math.round(amount * VAT.rate(currency)); return this; } @Override public boolean equals(Object obj) { if (obj instanceof Price other) { return Objects.equals(this.currency, other.currency) && this.amount == other.amount; } else { return false; } } @Override public String toString() { return String.format("%d %s", amount, currency); }}Now let's see what we can see: var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")price ==> 10000 SEKjshell> var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")expectedPrice ==> 12500 SEKjshell> var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()priceWithVAT ==> 2500 SEK">jshell> var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")price ==> 10000 SEKjshell> var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")expectedPrice ==> 12500 SEKjshell> var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()priceWithVAT ==> 2500 SEKThis is a lot better! Now we can clearly see that our expected price is 12500 SEK (in minor units, that is) and ouractual price is 2500 SEK.If we stare at the Price.applyVAT method, we can see why:public Price applyVAT() { amount = Math.round(amount * VAT.rate(currency)); return this;}Oops! We're setting the amount to the VAT applied, not adding the VAT to the current amount. This can be easilyfixed:public Price applyVAT() { amount += Math.round(amount * VAT.rate(currency)); return this;}Now things should be better: var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")price ==> 10000 SEKjshell> var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")expectedPrice ==> 12500 SEKjshell> var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()priceWithVAT ==> 12500 SEKjshell> priceWithVAT.equals(expectedPrice)priceWithVAT.equals(expectedPrice)$67 ==> true">jshell> var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")price ==> 10000 SEKjshell> var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")expectedPrice ==> 12500 SEKjshell> var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()priceWithVAT ==> 12500 SEKjshell> priceWithVAT.equals(expectedPrice)priceWithVAT.equals(expectedPrice)$67 ==> trueIndeed they are!Now we can return to our mapping: var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))prices ==> [10000 SEK, 1000 EUR]jshell> var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()pricesWithVAT ==> [12500 SEK, 1200 EUR]jshell> pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()$70 ==> 12500">jshell> var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))prices ==> [10000 SEK, 1000 EUR]jshell> var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()pricesWithVAT ==> [12500 SEK, 1200 EUR]jshell> pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()$70 ==> 12500Looks great! Now let's see if our applyVAT function is working better: var pricesWithVAT = applyVAT(prices)var pricesWithVAT = applyVAT(prices)pricesWithVAT ==> [15625 SEK, 1440 EUR]jshell> pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()$72 ==> 15625">jshell> var pricesWithVAT = applyVAT(prices)var pricesWithVAT = applyVAT(prices)pricesWithVAT ==> [15625 SEK, 1440 EUR]jshell> pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()$72 ==> 15625Wait a second here! applyVAT is increasing the price somehow! If we go back to staring at Price.applyVAT, we canfigure that out, too:public Price applyVAT() { amount +=

Results for ammo sek sunglasses - OpticsPlanet

Math.round(amount * VAT.rate(currency)); return this;}We forgot that just because our list of prices is immutable when using streams, the individual Price objects are not!And since we're modifying the price in this method, calling applyVAT a second time will apply VAT to the price thathas already had VAT applied to it, which hardly seems fair to the poor consumer.Again, the fix is fairly straightforward. We should create a new Price rather than modifying the one we have:public Price applyVAT() { return new Price(amount + Math.round(amount * VAT.rate(currency)), currency);}If we paste the new version of the class into JShell, we can then see if our fix worked: var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))prices ==> [10000 SEK, 1000 EUR]jshell> var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()pricesWithVAT ==> [12500 SEK, 1200 EUR]jshell> pricesWithVAT.get(0)pricesWithVAT.get(0)$76 ==> 12500 SEKjshell> applyVAT(prices).get(0)applyVAT(prices).get(0)$77 ==> 12500 SEK">jshell> var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))prices ==> [10000 SEK, 1000 EUR]jshell> var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()pricesWithVAT ==> [12500 SEK, 1200 EUR]jshell> pricesWithVAT.get(0)pricesWithVAT.get(0)$76 ==> 12500 SEKjshell> applyVAT(prices).get(0)applyVAT(prices).get(0)$77 ==> 12500 SEKVictory is ours, surprisingly!For developers used to Erlang or Haskell or Scala or Clojure, there's still an annoyance here, though: it takes 40 linesof code to represent a price, and then you have to be careful about how you implement methods to ensure that objects areimmutable!Records to the rescueJava 16 fixes this problem with something calledRecord Classes, which are similar tocase classes in Scala and records in Erlang. They are intended to be transparent carriers of shallowly immutable data.We can replace all of our Price class with a single line:public record Price(long amount, String currency) { }This lets us do all sorts of neat stuff: var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")price ==> Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK]jshell> price.amount()price.amount()$80 ==> 10000jshell> price.currency()price.currency()$81 ==> "SEK"jshell> var price2 = new Price(10000, "SEK")var price2 = new Price(10000, "SEK")price2 ==> Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK]jshell> price.equals(price2)price.equals(price2)$83 ==> true">jshell> var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")price ==> Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK]jshell> price.amount()price.amount()$80 ==> 10000jshell> price.currency()price.currency()$81 ==> "SEK"jshell> var price2 = new Price(10000, "SEK")var price2 = new Price(10000, "SEK")price2 ==> Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK]jshell> price.equals(price2)price.equals(price2)$83 ==> trueSo a record class gives us all the following without having to write any code:A constructor which initialises all fieldsGetters for all fields (without the annoying get prefix)A toString override that shows us the values of the fieldsAn equals override that returns true if two objects are both instances of the record class and all their fieldshave the same valuesOf course, we've lost one piece of functionality: our applyVAT method. No worries! Since a record class is also aclass, we can add methods to it just like any other class:public record Price(long amount, String currency) { public Price applyVAT() { return new Price(amount + Math.round(amount * VAT.rate(currency)), currency); }}Checking in with JShell proves that all is well: var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))prices. View the profiles of people named Ammo Sek. Join Facebook to connect with Ammo Sek and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and

Results for ammo sek hogue - OpticsPlanet

Now write a function that takes a list of prices and applies VAT to them: applyVAT(List prices) { return prices.stream() .map(Price::applyVAT) .toList();}">ListPrice> applyVAT(ListPrice> prices) { return prices.stream() .map(Price::applyVAT) .toList();}Turning to JShell: var pricesWithVAT = applyVAT(prices)var pricesWithVAT = applyVAT(prices)pricesWithVAT ==> [Price@4d76f3f8, Price@2d8e6db6]jshell> pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()$43 ==> 625">jshell> var pricesWithVAT = applyVAT(prices)var pricesWithVAT = applyVAT(prices)pricesWithVAT ==> [Price@4d76f3f8, Price@2d8e6db6]jshell> pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()$43 ==> 625This looks good, but something is nagging at us. When we applied VAT to our list of prices with prices.stream().map(),the new price of the first item was 2500, but when we used applyVAT(prices), it was 625. Given that applyVAT isnothing more than taking the code we typed out in JShell and putting it in a function for convenience, what in theworld is going on here?Let's do some arithmetic ourselves. If the VAT that should be applied to a price in Swedish Kronor (SEK) is 25% and theprice is 100 SEK, the price with VAT applied should be 125 SEK. Let's see if that's true: var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")price ==> Price@619a5dffjshell> var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK") var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")expectedPrice ==> Price@497470edjshell> var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()priceWithVAT ==> Price@619a5dffjshell> priceWithVAT == expectedPrice$48 ==> false">jshell> var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")price ==> Price@619a5dffjshell> var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK") var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")expectedPrice ==> Price@497470edjshell> var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()priceWithVAT ==> Price@619a5dffjshell> priceWithVAT == expectedPrice$48 ==> falseThis is clearly not what we expected. But wait! What does == actually do in Java? We have some vague memory that we'resupposed to use string1.equals(string2) instead of string1 == string2, because what == does is tests whether thetwo variables have references that point to the same space in memory.This is not what we want here, because we consider two prices with the same amount and currency to be equal to eachother. We can fix this by overriding the equals method for our Price class:public class Price { private long amount; private String currency; public Price(long amount, String currency) { this.amount = amount; this.currency = currency; } public long getAmount() { return amount; } public String getCurrency() { return currency; } public Price applyVAT() { amount = Math.round(amount * VAT.rate(currency)); return this; } @Override public boolean equals(Object obj) { if (obj instanceof Price other) { return Objects.equals(this.currency, other.currency) && this.amount == other.amount; } else { return false; } }}Alright, let's see if that fixed it: var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")price ==> Price@22927a81jshell> var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")expectedPrice ==> Price@5e8c92f4jshell> var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()priceWithVAT ==> Price@22927a81jshell> priceWithVAT.equals(expectedPrice)priceWithVAT.equals(expectedPrice)$57 ==> false">jshell> var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")var price = new Price(10000, "SEK")price ==> Price@22927a81jshell> var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")var expectedPrice = new Price(12500, "SEK")expectedPrice ==> Price@5e8c92f4jshell> var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()var priceWithVAT = price.applyVAT()priceWithVAT ==> Price@22927a81jshell> priceWithVAT.equals(expectedPrice)priceWithVAT.equals(expectedPrice)$57 ==> falseNo dice, it seems. :(It's really hard to understand why this is, since JShell is just telling us that ==> [Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK], Price[amount=1000, currency=EUR]]jshell> var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()pricesWithVAT ==> [Price[amount=12500, currency=SEK], Price[amount=1200, currency=EUR]]jshell> pricesWithVAT.get(0)pricesWithVAT.get(0)$88 ==> Price[amount=12500, currency=SEK]jshell> applyVAT(prices).get(0)applyVAT(prices).get(0)$89 ==> Price[amount=12500, currency=SEK]">jshell> var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))prices ==> [Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK], Price[amount=1000, currency=EUR]]jshell> var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()pricesWithVAT ==> [Price[amount=12500, currency=SEK], Price[amount=1200, currency=EUR]]jshell> pricesWithVAT.get(0)pricesWithVAT.get(0)$88 ==> Price[amount=12500, currency=SEK]jshell> applyVAT(prices).get(0)applyVAT(prices).get(0)$89 ==> Price[amount=12500, currency=SEK]Solving the problemAs per our original problem statement, we're actually trying to sum up all the prices for which VAT applies, meaningthat we need to discard non-EEA prices. We can do this with the filter intermediate stream operation: VAT.rate(price.currency()) > 0).toList()">prices.stream().filter(price -> VAT.rate(price.currency()) > 0).toList()Let's see it in action: var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"), new Price(1000, "USD"))var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"), new Price(1000, "USD"))prices ==> [Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK], Price[amount= ... mount=1000, currency=USD]]jshell> prices.stream().filter(price -> VAT.rate(price.currency()) > 0).toList()prices.stream().filter(price -> VAT.rate(price.currency()) > 0).toList()$94 ==> [Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK], Price[amount=1000, currency=EUR]]">jshell> var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"), new Price(1000, "USD"))var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"), new Price(1000, "USD"))prices ==> [Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK], Price[amount= ... mount=1000, currency=USD]]jshell> prices.stream().filter(price -> VAT.rate(price.currency()) > 0).toList()prices.stream().filter(price -> VAT.rate(price.currency()) > 0).toList()$94 ==> [Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK], Price[amount=1000, currency=EUR]]This looks perfect! Prices in US dollars shouldn't have VAT applied, and sure enough, the USD price is omitted from thefiltered list.We can even make this tidier by adding a tiny helper method to Price: 0; }}">public record Price(long amount, String currency) { public Price applyVAT() { return new Price(amount + Math.round(amount * VAT.rate(currency)), currency); } public boolean hasVAT() { return VAT.rate(currency) > 0; }}This looks a lot nicer: var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"), new Price(1000, "USD"))var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"), new Price(1000, "USD"))prices ==> [Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK], Price[amount= ... mount=1000, currency=USD]]jshell> prices.stream().filter(Price::hasVAT).toList()prices.stream().filter(Price::hasVAT).toList()$103 ==> [Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK], Price[amount=1000, currency=EUR]]">jshell> var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"), new Price(1000, "USD"))var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"), new Price(1000, "USD"))prices ==> [Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK], Price[amount= ... mount=1000, currency=USD]]jshell> prices.stream().filter(Price::hasVAT).toList()prices.stream().filter(Price::hasVAT).toList()$103 ==> [Price[amount=10000, currency=SEK], Price[amount=1000, currency=EUR]]To sum things up, we can just take what we know about reduce and guess how to do it with streams: acc + amount)">prices.stream() .filter(Price::hasVAT) .map(Price::amount) .reduce(0, (acc, amount) -> acc + amount)Let's see if this works in JShell: prices.stream().filter(Price::hasVAT).map(Price::amount).reduce(0L, (acc, amount) -> acc + amount)prices.stream().filter(Price::hasVAT).map(Price::amount).reduce(0L, (acc, amount) -> acc + amount)$104 ==> 11000">jshell> prices.stream().filter(Price::hasVAT).map(Price::amount).reduce(0L, (acc, amount) -> acc + amount)prices.stream().filter(Price::hasVAT).map(Price::amount).reduce(0L, (acc, amount) -> acc + amount)$104 ==> 11000We can also use a function reference rather than a lambda for the reducer: prices.stream().filter(Price::hasVAT).map(Price::amount).reduce(0L, Long::sum)prices.stream().filter(Price::hasVAT).map(Price::amount).reduce(0L, Long::sum)$105 ==> 11000">jshell> prices.stream().filter(Price::hasVAT).map(Price::amount).reduce(0L, Long::sum)prices.stream().filter(Price::hasVAT).map(Price::amount).reduce(0L, Long::sum)$105 ==> 11000It's a little annoying that we have to provide an initial value for reduce, since the identity for addition is wellunderstood, and also annoying that we have to write it as 0L so that Java can understand the types; if we just write0, we get the following explosion:) is not applicable| (argument mismatch; int cannot be converted to java.lang.Long)| method java.util.stream.Stream.reduce(U,java.util.function.BiFunction,java.util.function.BinaryOperator) is not applicable| (cannot infer type-variable(s)

Results for ammo sek rifle - OpticsPlanet

How about constructing aprice? new Price(10000, "SEK")new Price(10000, "SEK")$4 ==> Price@76fb509a">jshell> new Price(10000, "SEK")new Price(10000, "SEK")$4 ==> Price@76fb509aThe next thing we need is a way to know if VAT applies to a given price. We'll take the naive approach of assuming thatonly European Economic Area countries apply VAT, and that all countries using the Euro have the same VAT rate (theydon't). Let's define a VAT class with a rate function that returns the VAT rate for a given currency code: 0.19; case "BGN", "EUR" -> 0.20; case "CZK" -> 0.21; case "PLN" -> 0.23; case "DKK", "SEK" -> 0.25; case "HUF" -> 0.27; }; }}">public class VAT { public static double rate(String currency) { return switch (currency) { case "RON" -> 0.19; case "BGN", "EUR" -> 0.20; case "CZK" -> 0.21; case "PLN" -> 0.23; case "DKK", "SEK" -> 0.25; case "HUF" -> 0.27; }; }}If you take a closer look at that switch statement, you may notice that it's actually a switch expression,since it returns a value! Thiswas added in Java 14 and enablesall sorts of cool stuff, some of which we are using here:Since switch is now an expression, we can return its result instead of needing to assign to a temporary variable orreturn a value from each branchNo fall-through, so we don't need explicit break statements; instead, we can list multiple constants in a case,like we did for Bulgarian Leva and Euros: case "BGN", "EUR"And as we're about to see, the cases of a switch expression are exhaustiveTo explain that final point, let's try evaluating our VAT class in JShell: }| Error:| the switch expression does not cover all possible input values| return switch (currency) {| ^------------------..."> ...> }| Error:| the switch expression does not cover all possible input values| return switch (currency) {| ^------------------...What we're being told here is that our cases don't cover all the possible values a String can have, which makessense, since a string can be of any length, and contain any characters. This makes all possible values effectivelyinfinite, which means that the eight strings covered by our cases will not suffice. We can fix this by adding a defaultcase: 0.19; case "BGN", "EUR" -> 0.20; case "CZK" -> 0.21; case "PLN" -> 0.23; case "DKK", "SEK" -> 0.25; case "HUF" -> 0.27; default -> 0.0; }; }}">public class VAT { public static double rate(String currency) { return switch (currency) { case "RON" -> 0.19; case "BGN", "EUR" -> 0.20; case "CZK" -> 0.21; case "PLN" -> 0.23; case "DKK", "SEK" -> 0.25; case "HUF" -> 0.27; default -> 0.0; }; }}If we paste this into JShell, now we get the report: }| created class VAT"> ...> }| created class VATLet's give it a try: VAT.rate("SEK")VAT.rate("SEK")$8 ==> 0.25jshell> VAT.rate("EUR")VAT.rate("EUR")$9 ==> 0.2jshell> VAT.rate("USD")VAT.rate("USD")$10 ==> 0.0">jshell> VAT.rate("SEK")VAT.rate("SEK")$8 ==> 0.25jshell> VAT.rate("EUR")VAT.rate("EUR")$9 ==> 0.2jshell> VAT.rate("USD")VAT.rate("USD")$10 ==> 0.0Looks good!switch gets even more powerful in Java 17 withpattern matching!Compared to Haskell or Erlang, it's slightly more limited since it can't destructure lists and other data structures(though it looks like

Results for ammo sek single - OpticsPlanet

That is coming, according to JEP 405), but it does match ontypes and add guards and do simple binding. Read more about it if you're interested. The one caveat is that patternmatching for switch is being previewed in Java 17, so there's a tiny chance it might be changed a little before it'spermanently added in a later version.We can now use this to add a method to Price to apply VAT:public class Price { private long amount; private String currency; public Price(long amount, String currency) { this.amount = amount; this.currency = currency; } public long getAmount() { return amount; } public String getCurrency() { return currency; } public Price applyVAT() { amount = Math.round(amount * VAT.rate(currency)); return this; }}We can now play around with this: var p = new Price(10000, "SEK")var p = new Price(10000, "SEK")p ==> Price@49c2faaejshell> var p2 = p.applyVAT()var p2 = p.applyVAT()p2 ==> Price@49c2faaejshell> p2.getAmount()p2.getAmount()$16 ==> 2500">jshell> var p = new Price(10000, "SEK")var p = new Price(10000, "SEK")p ==> Price@49c2faaejshell> var p2 = p.applyVAT()var p2 = p.applyVAT()p2 ==> Price@49c2faaejshell> p2.getAmount()p2.getAmount()$16 ==> 2500Excellent! Let's now apply VAT to a list of prices!A better way to mapWe could use our existing map function to apply VAT to a list of prices: var prices = TreePVector.from(Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR")))var prices = TreePVector.from(Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR")))prices ==> [Price@531d72ca, Price@22d8cfe0]jshell> var pricesWithVAT = map(Price::applyVAT, prices)var pricesWithVAT = map(Price::applyVAT, prices)pricesWithVAT ==> [Price@531d72ca, Price@22d8cfe0]jshell> first(pricesWithVAT).getAmount()first(pricesWithVAT).getAmount()$28 ==> 625">jshell> var prices = TreePVector.from(Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR")))var prices = TreePVector.from(Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR")))prices ==> [Price@531d72ca, Price@22d8cfe0]jshell> var pricesWithVAT = map(Price::applyVAT, prices)var pricesWithVAT = map(Price::applyVAT, prices)pricesWithVAT ==> [Price@531d72ca, Price@22d8cfe0]jshell> first(pricesWithVAT).getAmount()first(pricesWithVAT).getAmount()$28 ==> 625But as we complained at the end of the first section, this doesn't look like any Java we've ever seen. Let's see if wecan fix that!Java 8 introduced something called the Stream API, which givesus a standard map function so we don't have to roll our own! It looks like this:prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT)The stream method was added to the Collection interface in Java, which means it is implemented for things like listsand sets and so on. What it returns is a "pipeline", on which intermediate operations (which return a Stream) andterminal operations (which return a result of a definite type) can be performed.map is an intermediate operation, meaning that we can perform further operations on our stream. In our case, we wanta new list of prices with VAT applied, so we can use the terminal operation toList to accomplish that:prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()Let's get rid of all the persistent data structures, now that we don't really need them to avoid memory copies, andtest this puppy out! var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))prices ==> [Price@108c4c35, Price@4ccabbaa]jshell> var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()pricesWithVAT ==> [Price@108c4c35, Price@4ccabbaa]jshell> pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()$36 ==> 2500">jshell> var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))var prices = Arrays.asList(new Price(10000, "SEK"), new Price(1000, "EUR"))prices ==> [Price@108c4c35, Price@4ccabbaa]jshell> var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()var pricesWithVAT = prices.stream().map(Price::applyVAT).toList()pricesWithVAT ==> [Price@108c4c35, Price@4ccabbaa]jshell> pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()pricesWithVAT.get(0).getAmount()$36 ==> 2500Very nice!We can. View the profiles of people named Ammo Sek. Join Facebook to connect with Ammo Sek and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and

Results for ammo sek vision - OpticsPlanet

Own torrents and comment on torrents.Since January 2012, it also features a Physibles category for 3D-printable objects.The contents of these categories can be sorted by file name, the number of seeders or leechers, the date posted, etc.As of September 2008 update, The Pirate Bay consisted of 31 dedicated servers including nine dynamic web fronts, a database, two search engines, and eight BitTorrent trackers.The site commented: Not having torrents will be a bit cheaper for us but it will also make it harder for our common enemies to stop us.The site added that torrents being shared by fewer than ten people will retain their torrent files, to ensure compatibility with older software that may not support magnet links.This caused some consternation since Lundstrm, an heir to the Wasabrd fortune, is known for financing several far-right political parties and movements like Sverigedemokraterna and Bevara Sverige Svenskt ( Keep Sweden Swedish ).During the talk show, Piratbyrn spokesman Tobias Andersson acknowledged that without Lundstrms support, Pirate Bay would not have been able to start and stated that most of the money went towards acquiring servers and bandwidth.Billboard claimed that the site in 2009 appeals for donations to keep its service running.In 2006, Petter Nilsson, a candidate on the Swedish political reality show Toppkandidaterna ( The Top Candidates ), donated 35,000 SEK (US4,925.83) to The Pirate Bay, which they used to buy new servers.According to speculations by Svenska Dagbladet, the advertisements generate about 600,000 SEK (US84,000) per month.In an investigation in 2006, the police concluded that The Pirate Bay brings in 1.2 million SEK (US169,000) per year from advertisements.The prosecution estimated in the 2009 trial from emails and screenshots that the advertisements pay over 10 million SEK (US1.4M) a year, 84 but the indictment used the estimate from the police investigation.The lawyers of the sites administrators counted the 2006 revenue closer to 725,000 SEK (US102,000).The verdict of the first trial, however, quoted the estimate from the preliminary investigation.The Pirate Bay, he says, may ultimately be operating at a loss.In the 2009 trial, the defence estimated the sites yearly expenses to be 800,000 SEK (US110,000).In 2007, an online ad agency placed Wal-Mart The Simpsons DVD ads along with search results that included downloads of the series.In 2012, banner ads for Canadas Department of Finance Economic Action Plan were placed atop search results, as part of a larger media buy, but were pulled quickly.In 2007, BayImg, an image hosting website similar to TinyPic went online in June.Pre-publication images posted to BayImg became part of a legal battle when Conde Nast s network was later allegedly hacked.In July, within hours after Ingmar Bergman s death, BergmanBits.com was launched, listing torrents for the directors films, 96 100 101 online until mid-2008.In August, The Pirate Bay relaunched the BitTorrent website Suprnova.org to perform the same functions as The Pirate Bay, with different torrent trackers, but the site languished; the domain was returned to its original owner in August 2010, and it now redirects to TorrentFreak.tv.Suprbay.org was introduced in August as