Sweet science of fighting

If you believe Steven Segal, he will lead you to believe Aikido is the most impressive martial art. At the Sweet Science of Fighting, we value practicality and efficiency leading to better fighting, and Aikido doesn’t have much fighting in it. So, this comparison will be different than usual, as the two have nothing in common.MMA is better in every measurable criteria and wins every time in a direct battle between against Aikido, and it does so effortlessly. Aikido is not a tested fighting system, whereas MMA is the closest we get to a real fight in a sport scenario.There are many videos online where an Aikido master tries his art against an MMA fighter or other competitive combat athlete and every time the result is the same- a humiliation for the Aikidoka.This does not mean Aikido does not have its merit. It’s just ineffective as a real fighting system. But what are the benefits of Aikido that could make it worth training?What Is Aikido?What Is MMA?Key Differences Between Aikido and MMACompetitivenessPhilosophyTechniquesEquipmentCompetitive LandscapeAikido vs. MMA for Self DefenseDo MMA Fighters Use Aikido?MMA Fighters With An Aikido BackgroundIs Aikido Effective In A Real Fight?Should You Start Aikido Or MMA?What Is Aikido?Aikido is a traditional Japanese martial art created by Morihei Ueshiba in the early 20th century after a lifelong study of traditional Japanese martial disciplines and religious beliefs.What sets Aikido apart from other martial arts is that it’s an utterly soft system using techniques to blend with the attack and redirect

Nutrition plans, game plans, styles, techniques, and more. Where Did The Term “Sweet Science” Come From?The term "Sweet Science" was first used by a British sportswriter named Pierce Egan back in 1813. He used this phrase to describe how fighters need to approach boxing in a scientific manner. It's not just about throwing punches randomly but rather strategizing and finding ways to defeat your opponent. Interestingly, boxing has been compared to chess, a game of strategy, by Lennox Lewis, a former heavyweight world champion who was also a chess enthusiast. We agree with Lewis, and have even written an article of the similarities of chess and boxing in this article.Although the term was coined in 1813, the idea that boxing had a scientific and methodical approach was introduced even earlier, in the late 1700s, by a boxer named Daniel Mendoza. Mendoza developed a style that focused on agility and defense rather than pure offense. He would sidestep and duck to avoid punches, using a more defensive approach. He even opened his own boxing school in 1789 and wrote a book called The Art of Boxing that teaches his scientific method of boxing. It is the best insight available into his 18th-century boxing technique.The Best Examples Of “The Sweet Science”The term "sweet science" is highly relevant in modern boxing. Nowadays, every boxer needs to be strategic and use tactics inside the ring, regardless of whether they're known for their aggressive style. A little bit of science is necessary for success in the sport. Being gifted alone is not enough to survive or excel in boxing. Strategic thinking is crucial. Let's take a look at a few fighters who exemplify the concept of “The Sweet Science.”Muhammad Ali, often regarded as the greatest boxer of all time, perfectly embodied “The Sweet Science.” He would employ mental tactics to intimidate his opponents and get them riled up. During fights, he showcased flawless footwork and head movement, allowing him to evade punches and deliver lightning-fast and precise counters. In most cases, he would exhaust his opponents, dragging them into deep waters, and finish them off

Within the realm of boxing, there is a phrase that experts often use called: "The Sweet Science." This term hints at a deeper level of complexity and strategy that goes beyond mere physicality.When we talk about “The Sweet Science," we are referring to boxers who possess exceptional technical skills and display strategic prowess inside the ring. These fighters don't solely rely on raw power and aggression; instead, they employ their minds and employ a meticulously calculated plan.These boxers embody patience, constantly analyzing their opponents, searching for weaknesses, and adapting their tactics on the fly. They demonstrate mastery in every aspect of the game, from their fluid movements to their ability to create angles and their precise reactions when attacking.If you’ve ever wounded why boxers call it “The Sweet Science," continue reading this article to delve into its origins, gain a deeper understanding of its meaning, and explore notable examplesWhat Does “The Sweet Science” Mean?While boxing may seem straightforward at first glance, it's actually a complex sport that involves scientific principles. In the world of boxing, where many new or amateur fighters rely on aggression, bravery, and power, the concept of “The Sweet Science" takes things to another level. The term refers to boxers who stay calm and strategic, aiming to win the fight without taking too much damage. On the night of the fight, these boxers appear composed and in control, allowing them to observe their opponent, gather information, develop a plan, and effectively defeat them.They have the ability to find the right balance, adapt to what their opponent is doing, calculate every move, and consistently stay one step ahead. And remember, they have to do all of this in the middle of the fight, with a roaring crowd of hundreds or even thousands of people. It takes a special mindset, intelligence, and courage to achieve this - this is a true fighter's mindset.Just like real science, boxing is always changing and evolving. There's no one-size-fits-all formula for success, and it has been that way for a long time. Fighters and coaches are constantly searching for new skills, training strategies,

Sports.Gods of War by Springs ToledoThis collection of essays celebrates boxing's greatest champions with poetic prose and sharp analysis. Springs Toledo elevates the sweet science into an art form, offering readers a thoughtful and passionate exploration of the sport.The Hurt BusinessThis anthology compiles 100 years of the finest writing about boxing, including Mark Kriegel's standout essay on Oscar De La Hoya, "The Great (Almost) White Hope." It's a rich celebration of boxing's storytelling tradition, showcasing the drama and humanity of the ring.American Shaolin by Matthew PollyMatthew Polly's memoir recounts his journey to the Shaolin Temple in China, where he trained in kung fu and immersed himself in the life of a monk. With humor and introspection, Polly captures the challenges and triumphs of his extraordinary quest.Live Fast, Die Young: The Life and Times of Harry Greb by Stephen ComptonStephen Compton offers a meticulously researched biography of Harry Greb, one of boxing's most enigmatic figures. This book captures Greb's fierce fighting style and the fascinating, turbulent life he led outside the ring.Combat Sports in the Ancient World by Michael B. PoliakoffMichael Poliakoff's scholarly exploration of ancient combat sports highlights wrestling, pankration, and gladiatorial contests. This book is a captivating read for history buffs and combat sports fans interested in the origins of martial traditions.Atlas: From the Streets to the Ring by Teddy AtlasTeddy Atlas's autobiography details his journey from a troubled youth to a revered boxing trainer. His candid reflections on life, redemption, and the fight game make this a moving

Cake extra sweet, and "too sweet" can indeed be a bad thing.Since the release, I really tried to like SF × Tekken. (That begsthe question - should one really have to try to like a fighting game?) Any old school 2Dfighting game fan like myself had HUGE expectations from Capcom with thisproject (especially after all those epic trailers they released). While some core aspects are enjoyable, unfortunately, Yoshinori Ono and the team took quite a few missteps thistime. Overall, SFXT doesn't feel like "Street Fighter integratedwith Tekken"... but more so, a "super-happy version of Street Fighter integrated with someone'simprecise and lackadaisical interpretation of Tekken". Still, SFXTisn't nearly the worst fighting game I've ever played (although somedrama queens out there make it out to be). Thankfully, I can enjoySFXT casually, butI also can't seem to forget all the missed opportunities. Perhapsthat's where Namco will come in when they step up to the plate with theiriteration of the crossover (Tekken × SF). I'd bet my last dollar that Namcowill drop a good chunk of the "silliness factor" and deliver a more straight forward,serious fighting game. (They did so with TEKKEN 7 at least, which featured one of Akuma's best appearances to date.)~TFG Webmaster | @Fighters_Gen On Disc DLC — 12 New Characters As you probably know, there are 12 additional characters that appear in the portable, Playstation Vita version of the game. These characters were later released as purchasable DLC for the console versions on July 31st, 2012. The fact that the